Blogger's Note: Sorry this was a bit late! I actually struggled with respond meaningfully to all these articles and find connective links (but that might be because I read the first half of the articles a while ago). I can't wait for the class discussion on these ideas!
“Texting insincerely: the
role of the period in text messaging”
This
was a really interesting research study! I had never thought anything about how
I used my periods in texts before. Consulting my iPhone revealed that I do
display some of the patterns explored in this study. Most of the texts where I
expected an on-going conversation didn’t have a terminal period. My dad’s texts
always end in a period or other kind of punctuation, giving a sense of
finality, but I wonder if it is because he texts professionally a lot for his
job. My mom on the other hand never uses periods, but she uses shorthand
whenever possible and even creates her own acronyms.
This
study was not too surprising. I think the term “depressed” can be a little too
liberally thrown around sometimes, but I have had periods of sadness in my life
and I’ve definitely find that having real friends is the most helpful at
getting me out of them.
I
think the advice of this article should apply to positive and negative
feedback, and not just for the sake of argument. I think people sometimes don’t
examine their opinions past their knee-jerk responses, good or bad, and there
can be something gained by always questioning what you think or believe.
I
was in middle school when I began to notice my peers getting cellphones. So
I’ve grown up with the rhetoric of how rude it is to use your cellphone when
you are supposed to be spending time with other people. I feel like one idea
that is not really explored in this article is how others perceive others’ use
of cellphones. Last semester, multitasking was a topic in one of my classes and
one of the things we learned is people think they are better at multitasking
than they actually are. I wonder if some people think they are enhancing the
group by consulting their phones, but really are not.
I
thought this article was interesting for the detail with which it went into
each element of dating in the digital age. I don’t, however, have any other relevant thoughts.
My
conclusion after reading this article is that social media helps you stay in
contact with people you probably shouldn’t stay in contact with. I don’t really
agree with the O’Connor’s assertion that “shutting the door on something is
something we never want to do.” I think her opinion represents a very specific
kind of person who likes life to be a bit messy.
I
sympathize with the use of my smartphone as a “social prop” to “hide
awkwardness” and to “fill the silence.” I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad
thing to do if everyone else around you is doing it. I only think it is really
bad when you do it when you are with someone who clearly has all their
attention focused on you. Then it’s inexcusably rude.
I
found this story really enlightening. The only part I did not like was when it
turned and blamed the Internet on the failure of people being able to connect.
To expect people to be able to find compatible people with which to bond only
in the places where they happen to live is unrealistic. Especially thinking
about LGBTQ kids unfortunate enough to be born into extremely conservative
families and communities. I truly believe the Internet has actually saved lives.
I agree that bonding is important and love the insights about addiction this
article provides. But I hate the direction it took at the end. It was
unnecessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment